Powered by Blogger.

About this blog

These are all original case digests or case briefs done while the author was studying law school in the Philippines.

Hopefully these digested cases will help you get a good grasp of the salient facts and rulings of the Supreme Court in order to have a better understanding of Philippine Jurisprudence.

Please forgive any typo/grammatical errors as these were done while trying to keep up with the hectic demands brought about by the study of law.

God bless!

UPDATE:
Since the author is now a lawyer, this blog will now include templates of Philippine legal forms for your easy reference. This blog will be updated daily.

Thank you for the almost 500k views :)

Translate to your language

P.S.

If this blog post as helped you in any way, kindly click on any of the blog sponsors' advertisements. It won't cost you a thing. This would help tremendously.

Thank you for your time.

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Esso Standard Eastern Inc. v CIR (1989)


Esso Standard Eastern, Inc. v CIR GR Nos L-28508-9, July 7, 1989

FACTS:
Esso deducted from its gross income, as part of its ordinary and necessary business expenses, margin fees it had paid to the Central Bank on its profit remittances to its New York Office. The CIR disallowed the claimed deduction. ESSO appealed to the CTA but was denied. Hence, this petition.


ISSUE:
Whether the margin fees were deductible from gross income either as a

  1. (1)  tax or
  2. (2)  ordinary and necessary business expense
RULING:
  1. (1)  No, it is not a tax. A tax is levied to provide revenue for government operations, while the proceeds of the margin fee are applied to strengthen our country’s international reserves. Thus the margin fee was imposed by the State in the exercise of its police power ant not the power of taxation.

  2. (2)  No. ESSO has not shown that the remittance to the head office of part of its profits was made in furtherance of its own trade or business. The petitioner merely presumed that all corporate expenses are necessary and appropriate in the absence of a showing that they are illegal or ultra vires. This is error. The public respondent is correct when it asserts that the paramount rule is that claims for deductions are a matter of legislative grace and do not turn on mere equitable considerations... The taxpayer in every instance has the burden of justifying the allowance of any deduction claimed. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Treat yourself