Juan Luna Subdivision, Inc. v Sarmiento
GR No. L-3538, May 28, 1952
FACTS:
Plaintiff issued to the City Treasurer of Manila checks amounting for P2,210.52 drawn upon the Philippine Trust Company.
This check was to be applied to plaintiff’s land tax, the exact amount of which was yet undetermined. The City after liberation from Japanese to refund the plaintiff’s deposit or apply it to such future taxes as might be found due. Plaintiff, however, claims that the whole amount of the check contending that taxes during period have been remitted by Commonwealth Act No. 703.
ISSUE:
Does CA 703 cover taxes paid before its enactment as the plaintiff maintains and the courts below held, or does it refer,
as the City Treasurer believes, only to taxes which were still unpaid?
RULING:
The law is clear that it applies to “taxes and penalties due and payable”, i.e. taxes owed and owing. The remission of
taxes due and payable to the exclusion of taxes already collected does not constitute unfair discrimination. The taxpayers who paid their taxes before liberation and those who had not were not on the same footing on the need of material relief. Taxpayers who had been in arrears in their obligation would have to satisfy their liability with genuine currency, while the taxes paid during the occupation had been satisfied in Japanese War Notes, many of them at a time when those notes were well-nigh worthless. To refund those taxes with restored currency would unduly enrich many of the payers at a greater expense to the people at large.
FACTS:
Plaintiff issued to the City Treasurer of Manila checks amounting for P2,210.52 drawn upon the Philippine Trust Company.
This check was to be applied to plaintiff’s land tax, the exact amount of which was yet undetermined. The City after liberation from Japanese to refund the plaintiff’s deposit or apply it to such future taxes as might be found due. Plaintiff, however, claims that the whole amount of the check contending that taxes during period have been remitted by Commonwealth Act No. 703.
ISSUE:
Does CA 703 cover taxes paid before its enactment as the plaintiff maintains and the courts below held, or does it refer,
as the City Treasurer believes, only to taxes which were still unpaid?
RULING:
The law is clear that it applies to “taxes and penalties due and payable”, i.e. taxes owed and owing. The remission of
taxes due and payable to the exclusion of taxes already collected does not constitute unfair discrimination. The taxpayers who paid their taxes before liberation and those who had not were not on the same footing on the need of material relief. Taxpayers who had been in arrears in their obligation would have to satisfy their liability with genuine currency, while the taxes paid during the occupation had been satisfied in Japanese War Notes, many of them at a time when those notes were well-nigh worthless. To refund those taxes with restored currency would unduly enrich many of the payers at a greater expense to the people at large.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment