Powered by Blogger.

About this blog

These are all original case digests or case briefs done while the author was studying law school in the Philippines.

Hopefully these digested cases will help you get a good grasp of the salient facts and rulings of the Supreme Court in order to have a better understanding of Philippine Jurisprudence.

Please forgive any typo/grammatical errors as these were done while trying to keep up with the hectic demands brought about by the study of law.

God bless!

UPDATE:
Since the author is now a lawyer, this blog will now include templates of Philippine legal forms for your easy reference. This blog will be updated daily.

Thank you for the almost 500k views :)

Translate to your language

P.S.

If this blog post as helped you in any way, kindly click on any of the blog sponsors' advertisements. It won't cost you a thing. This would help tremendously.

Thank you for your time.

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Maceda v Macaraig (1991)


Maceda v Macaraig
GR No 88291, May 31, 1991


FACTS:
Commonwealth Act 120 created NAPOCOR as a public corporation to undertake the development of hydraulic power and the production of power from other sources. RA 358 granted NAPOCOR tax and duty exemption privileges. RA 6395 revised the charter of the NAPOCOR, tasking it to carry out the policy of the national electrification and provided in detail NAPOCOR’s tax exceptions. PD 380 specified that NAPOCOR’s exemption includes all taxes, etc. imposed “directly or indirectly.” PD 938 dated May 27, 1976 further amended the aforesaid provision by integrating the tax exemption in general terms under one paragraph.


ISSUE:
Whether or not NPC has ceased to enjoy indirect tax and duty exemption with the enactment of PD 938 on May 27, 1976 which amended PD 380 issued on January 11, 1974


RULING:
No, it is still exempt.
NAPOCOR is a non-profit public corporation created for the general good and welfare, and wholly owned by the government of the Republic of the Philippines. From the very beginning of the corporation’s existence, NAPOCOR enjoyed preferential tax treatment “to enable the corporation to pay the indebtedness and obligation” and effective implementation of the policy enunciated in Section 1 of RA 6395.


From the preamble of PD 938, it is evident that the provisions of PD 938 were not intended to be interpreted liberally so as to enhance the tax exempt status of NAPOCOR.

It is recognized that the rule on strict interpretation does not apply in the case of exemptions in favor of government political subdivision or instrumentality. In the case of property owned by the state or a city or other public corporations, the express exception should not be construed with the same degree of strictness that applies to exemptions contrary to the policy of the state, since as to such property “exception is the rule and taxation the exception.” 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Treat yourself