Powered by Blogger.

About this blog

These are all original case digests or case briefs done while the author was studying law school in the Philippines.

Hopefully these digested cases will help you get a good grasp of the salient facts and rulings of the Supreme Court in order to have a better understanding of Philippine Jurisprudence.

Please forgive any typo/grammatical errors as these were done while trying to keep up with the hectic demands brought about by the study of law.

God bless!

UPDATE:
Since the author is now a lawyer, this blog will now include templates of Philippine legal forms for your easy reference. This blog will be updated daily.

Thank you for the almost 500k views :)

Translate to your language

P.S.

If this blog post as helped you in any way, kindly click on any of the blog sponsors' advertisements. It won't cost you a thing. This would help tremendously.

Thank you for your time.

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Radio Communications of the Phils v CTA (1985)


Radio Communications of the Phils. V CTA GR No 60547, July 11, 1985

FACTS:
Under its original franchise, RA 2036 (1957), petitioner RCPI was subject to both the franchise tax and income tax. In

1964, petitioner’s franchise was amended by RA 4054 to the effect that its franchise tax of 1 and 1⁄2% of all gross receipts was provided as in lieu of any and all taxes of any kind and nature. In 1968, RA 4054 was repealed by RA 5431, which withdrew the exemption and subjected RCPI to taxes upon their taxable net income as imposed upon associations or corporations engaged in a similar business or industry.

ISSUE:
Whether the exemption under RA 4054 was repealed by RA 5431


RULING:
Yes. An examination of Section 24 of the Tax Code as amended shows clearly that the law intended all corporate

taxpayers to pay income tax as provided by the statute. There can be no doubt as to the power of Congress to repeal the earlier exemption it granted.

Article XIV, Section 5 of the 1973 Constitution expressly provide that no franchise shall be granted to any individual, firm or corporation except under the condition that it shall be subject to amendment, alteration, or repeal by the legislature when the public interest so requires.

There is no question as to the public interest involved. The country needs increased revenues. The repealing clause is clear and unambiguous. There is a listing of entities entitled to tax exemption. The petitioner is not covered by the provision. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Treat yourself