Republic v Mambulao Lumber Company, et al
GR No L-17725, February 28, 1962
FACTS:
Mambulao Lumber Company paid the Government a total of P 9,127.50 as reforestation charges for the years 1947 to
1956. It is the company’s contention that said sum of 9,127.50, not having been used in the reforestation of the area covered by its license, the same is refundable to it or may be applied in compensation of P 4,802.37 due from it as forest charges.
Court of First Instance of Manila ordered the company to pay the government the sum of P 4,802.37 with 6% interest thereon from date of the filing of the complaint until fully paid, plus costs. Thus, the present appeal.
ISSUE: Whether the set-off or compensation is proper
RULING:
No. There is nothing in the law which requires that the amount collected as reforestation charges should be used exclusively for the reforestation of the area covered by the license of a licensee or concessionaire, and that if not so used, the same shall be refunded to him.
The conclusion seems to be that the amount paid by a licensee as reforestation charges is in the nature of a tax which forms part of the Forestation Fund, payable by him irrespective of whether the area covered by his license is reforested or not.
Said fund, as the law expressly provides, shall be expended in carrying out the purposes provided for thereunder, namely, the reforestation or afforestation, among others, of denuded areas needing reforestation or afforestation.
The weight of authority is to the effect that internal revenue taxes, such as the forest charges in question is not subject to set-off or compensation. Taxes are not in the nature of contracts between the parties but grow out of a duty to, and are positive acts of the government, to the making and enforcing of which, the personal consent of the individual taxpayers is not required.
With respect to the forest charges which the company has paid to the government, they are in the coffers of the government as tax collected, and the government does not owe anything. It is crystal clear that the Republic of the Philippines and the Mambulao Lumber Company are not creditors and debtors of each other, because compensation refers to mutual debts.
FACTS:
Mambulao Lumber Company paid the Government a total of P 9,127.50 as reforestation charges for the years 1947 to
1956. It is the company’s contention that said sum of 9,127.50, not having been used in the reforestation of the area covered by its license, the same is refundable to it or may be applied in compensation of P 4,802.37 due from it as forest charges.
Court of First Instance of Manila ordered the company to pay the government the sum of P 4,802.37 with 6% interest thereon from date of the filing of the complaint until fully paid, plus costs. Thus, the present appeal.
ISSUE: Whether the set-off or compensation is proper
RULING:
No. There is nothing in the law which requires that the amount collected as reforestation charges should be used exclusively for the reforestation of the area covered by the license of a licensee or concessionaire, and that if not so used, the same shall be refunded to him.
The conclusion seems to be that the amount paid by a licensee as reforestation charges is in the nature of a tax which forms part of the Forestation Fund, payable by him irrespective of whether the area covered by his license is reforested or not.
Said fund, as the law expressly provides, shall be expended in carrying out the purposes provided for thereunder, namely, the reforestation or afforestation, among others, of denuded areas needing reforestation or afforestation.
The weight of authority is to the effect that internal revenue taxes, such as the forest charges in question is not subject to set-off or compensation. Taxes are not in the nature of contracts between the parties but grow out of a duty to, and are positive acts of the government, to the making and enforcing of which, the personal consent of the individual taxpayers is not required.
With respect to the forest charges which the company has paid to the government, they are in the coffers of the government as tax collected, and the government does not owe anything. It is crystal clear that the Republic of the Philippines and the Mambulao Lumber Company are not creditors and debtors of each other, because compensation refers to mutual debts.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment