Powered by Blogger.

About this blog

These are all original case digests or case briefs done while the author was studying law school in the Philippines.

Hopefully these digested cases will help you get a good grasp of the salient facts and rulings of the Supreme Court in order to have a better understanding of Philippine Jurisprudence.

Please forgive any typo/grammatical errors as these were done while trying to keep up with the hectic demands brought about by the study of law.

God bless!

UPDATE:
Since the author is now a lawyer, this blog will now include templates of Philippine legal forms for your easy reference. This blog will be updated daily.

Thank you for the almost 500k views :)

Translate to your language

P.S.

If this blog post as helped you in any way, kindly click on any of the blog sponsors' advertisements. It won't cost you a thing. This would help tremendously.

Thank you for your time.

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

Commissioner vs Tours Specialist 183 SCRA 402


Facts:
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue filed a petition to review on certiorari to the CTA decision which ruled that the money entrusted to private respondent Tours Specialist (TS), earmarked and paid for hotel room charges of tourists, travellers and/or foreign travel agencies do not form part of its gross receipt subject to 3% independent contractor’s tax. Tours Specialist derived income from its activities and services as a travel agency, which included booking tourists in local hotels. To supply such service, TS and its counterpart tourist agencies abroad have agreed to offer a package fee for the tourists (payment of hotel room accommodations, food and other personal expenses). By arrangement, the foreign tour agency entrusts to TS the fund for hotel room accommodation, which in turn paid by the latter to the local hotel when billed.

Despite this arrangement, CIR assessed private respondent for deficiency 3% contractor’s tax as independent contractor including the entrusted hotel room charges in its gross receipts from services for years 1974-1976 plus compromise penalty. During cross- examination, TS General Manager stated that the payment through them “is only an act of accommodation on (its) part” and “the agent abroad instead of sending several telexes and saving on bank charges they take the option to send the money to (TS) to be held in trust to be endorsed to the hotel.”’ Nevertheless, CIR caused the issuance of a warrant of distraint and levy, and had TS’ bank deposits garnished.

Issue:
WON amounts received by a local tourist and travel agency included in a package fee from tourists or foreign tour agencies, intended or earmarked for hotel accommodations form part of gross receipts subject to 3% contractor’s tax

Ruling:
No. Gross receipts subject to tax under the Tax Code do not include monies or receipts entrusted to the taxpayer which do not belong to them and do not redound to the taxpayer’s benefit; and it is not necessary that there must be a law or regulation which would exempt such monies or receipts within the meaning of gross receipts under the Tax Code. Parenthetically, the room charges entrusted by the foreign travel agencies to the private respondents do not form part of its gross receipts within the definition of the Tax Code. The said receipts never belonged to the private respondent. The private respondent never benefited from their payment to the local hotels. This arrangement was only to accommodate the foreign travel agencies. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Treat yourself